Building Surveillance System: Preliminary Assessment of Structures in Boston (Using Eye Tracking Technology)
In a groundbreaking study conducted at the Institute for Human Centered Design in Boston, researchers have delved into the intriguing world of eye-tracking patterns, exploring how our visual focus interacts with architecture, interior design, and cognitive science, particularly in the context of Boston buildings and interiors.
The study, which involved thirty-three volunteers aged 18 to 80 from various occupations, used an off-the-shelf Eye Tribe eye tracker to monitor the participants' eye movements. Each volunteer was asked to view sixty images on a computer screen, each for fifteen seconds. The images included a mix of human faces, landscapes, and Boston buildings, both interiors and exteriors.
The researchers recorded two key metrics: "Time To First Focus" on an element and "Revisits", indicating the number of times volunteers looked at the same area. Interestingly, the study found that volunteers spent on average 50% more time focusing on human faces compared to other image types, with no significant differences in the "Revisits" metric between human faces and other image types.
The results suggest a stronger visual appeal of human faces compared to other image types for a diverse group of people. Furthermore, the study found no significant differences in gaze patterns between age groups or occupations, indicating a consistent preference across demographics.
The study also generated heat maps, spotlight images, and videos of individual gaze paths, providing a visual representation of the volunteers' visual focus. These findings align with some relevant findings from related research, such as the preference for architectural spaces with living geometries, hierarchical clarity, and biophilic design elements that guide visual attention calmly and purposefully, reducing cognitive strain while enhancing engagement.
The study's findings may have significant implications for urban design, as they suggest that incorporating human elements could improve visual appeal. By understanding these eye-tracking patterns, designers can create spaces that are not only aesthetically pleasing but also promote comfortable and sustained visual engagement.
In conclusion, while the study did not focus specifically on Boston architecture, the findings provide valuable insights into the visual preferences of people when interacting with architectural spaces. As researchers continue to explore this interdisciplinary intersection, we can expect to gain a deeper understanding of how design can influence our cognitive processes and visual experiences.
In the realm of health-and-wellness and fitness-and-exercise, understanding eye-tracking patterns can provide valuable information for designers, as the study showed that human faces tend to captivate visual focus more than other image types, implying a preference for incorporating human elements in architectural designs. Moreover, technology, specifically eye tracking, can contribute significantly to science, offering new perspectives in urban design, leading to spaces that are not only aesthetically engaging but also promote cognitive comfort and visual engagement.
){kind=link}