Airbag failure in 2022 Tesla Model 3 following multi-vehicle collision leaves owner questioning similar incidents among other drivers.
=========================================================================
In a multi-vehicle accident on I-17, Rigo Ramos, a Tesla Model 3 owner, walked away unharmed alongside his two young daughters, despite the non-deployment of airbags in the impact. This incident has sparked discussions within the "Tesla Owners of Phoenix" community about the role of airbags in vehicle safety.
Tesla's safety systems are designed to be more than just flashy technology. They rely on structural strength, intelligent restraint systems, and sensors that evaluate whether airbags would help or harm in a given scenario. These systems assess various factors, such as:
- Deceleration Force: Sensors measure the deceleration, or slowing down, of the vehicle to determine the severity of the impact.
- Angle of Impact: Sensors analyze the angle at which the vehicle is struck to assess the potential damage and threat to occupants.
- Seat Occupancy: The system checks which seats are occupied to ensure that airbags are deployed only where necessary.
- Chassis Intrusion: Sensors detect if the vehicle's chassis has been breached, which could indicate a more severe impact requiring airbag deployment.
- Speed and Intensity of Impact: The system evaluates the speed of the vehicle and the intensity of the impact to decide whether airbags should deploy.
In Rigo's crash, it is suspected that the Model 3 absorbed the force through its crumple zones, while the cabin remained intact. The seat belts likely did their job anchoring Rigo and his daughters in place, and the internal sensors probably determined that airbags weren't necessary to prevent further injury.
This incident underscores the fact that airbags are not catch-all safety devices but rather tools for specific impact types. Some community members expressed concern about the non-deployment of airbags, while others pointed out the structural integrity of the vehicle and the rarity of such occurrences.
Tesla's restraint systems are built around the philosophy that airbags are not necessary in all scenarios. This approach explains why they may not deploy in some dramatic crashes. Airbags are programmed with nuanced sensors that make decisions based on the specifics of each accident, deploying only when their deployment would be safer than not deploying at all.
The absence of airbag deployment in Rigo's crash indicates that the occupants did not need them, as airbag deployment has its own risks. This incident highlights the confidence in Tesla's engineering and the shift in modern automotive safety, which goes beyond airbags and focuses on the structure and software of a vehicle's response in a crash.
Many buyers, even those who did not initially want to drive a Tesla, are enticed by this safety logic. The well-built nature of the car, despite the driver window shattering and the windshield coming in a bit, is a testament to Tesla's commitment to safety.
Aram Krajekian, an automotive journalist, provides a fresh perspective on the evolving automotive landscape. Follow him on X and LinkedIn for daily news coverage about cars.
[1] For more information on the intricacies of Tesla's safety systems, please refer to Tesla's official documentation.
- In the context of vehicle safety discussions within the "Tesla Owners of Phoenix" community, it is important to consider the role of technology in Tesla's safety systems, as they rely on various sensors and intelligent systems to decide when and if airbags should deploy.
- The non-deployment of airbags in Rigo's Tesla Model 3 crash might have been a result of the car's software-focused safety approach, which assesses the specifics of each accident to determine whether airbag deployment would be safer than not deploying at all.
